| |
| SUBJECT: |
The FAA: Stormy Skies |
| DATE POSTED: |
3/13/2002 |
| NAME: |
Sandra Wrobel |
| EMAIL: |
starspirit2@yahoo.com |
| |
March 13, 2002
I'm covered with goose bumps after reading "The FAA: Stormy Skies" dated 9/6/2000. One year later 9/11/2001, certainly brought changes to the FAA. The news on TV also now speaks about phony FAA licences being paid for and obtained in the black market. Mundane astrology gives us the chance to look back at predictions. Your analysis and predictions are remarkable Philip Sedgewick! |
|
| SUBJECT: |
Great Article |
| DATE POSTED: |
3/17/2001 |
| NAME: |
Javier Sola |
| |
I found this article to be very useful on the research i am doing on the FAA. Thanky a bunch and great journalism. |
|
| SUBJECT: |
corrected data for "birth" TWA 800 |
| DATE POSTED: |
9/7/2000 |
| NAME: |
Debbie Keil Holtsclaw |
| EMAIL: |
dkcalgal@aol.com |
| |
In my fervor to respond to Philip Sedgwick re: the FAA article, I gave incorrect data for the "birth' of TWA 800. The time was 1:21 p.m. EST, La Guardia Airport Feb 5, 1946.
For those who enjoy the "mythic" attributes, she was a Lockheed "Constellation" named the "Star of Paris." |
|
| SUBJECT: |
Philip Sedgewick's FAA article and TWA 800 |
| DATE POSTED: |
9/7/2000 |
| NAME: |
Debra Keil Holtsclaw |
| EMAIL: |
dkcalgal@aol.com |
| |
While I truly enjoyed this article, I realized that Mr. Sedgewick is working with the data available through the media. I agree that anyone who flies should definitely ask the administration, his congressman, etc. - what happened to the aviation trust fund.
However, as someone who has been a technical writer in aviation safety, a pilot, as well as an atrologer for the past 15 years, I would like astrologers to examine more data on TWA800 - birth time of TWA800 6:05pm EST, Feb 6, 1946 - New York, time of take-off 8:19pm EDT, Jamaica NY, lat/long and time of accident (within 3 sec. - time of a radar sweep) 40N38.5/72W36.5, 20:31:17 EDT.
Thanks to synchronicity, I not only have access to experts in radar, aircraft accident investigation, airline pilots, but also the (retired) engineers from TWA who knew every inch of this airplane (TW Ship#119).
The (vague) scenario you are being given by our government is impossible. The whistle-blower protection for gov't. employees (including the FAA & NTSB, as well as military) was rescinded regarding this accident. A representative from the FAA refused to force his employees to "report that they had seen nothing on the radar scopes," while the NTSB (whom I used to idolize) rolled over and did whatever they were instructed to do.
Dear Philip and all astrologers, take another look at the Pluto, etc. in this chart. Sadly, there is a whole other scenario at work - a major cover-up of another stupid military mistake. |
|
|
return to article
|
|
